European Banks Boycott Israeli Banks Because of ‘Settlements’
February 1, 2014Two of the largest banks in northern Europe have announced they will boycott Israeli banks because they operate in “occupied territories”, the Walla! Hebrew-language news website reported on Saturday.
The two banks in question are the Swedish Nordea Bank, which is the largest bank in Scandinavia, and the Norwegian Danske Bank, which is the largest bank in Denmark.
Danske Bank, which serves five million customers in Denmark and Northern Europe , publishes on its website a list of companies which are boycotted for legal and ethical reasons. Two weeks ago the list was updated and, according to Walla!, for the first time it includes an Israeli bank – Bank Hapoalim .
The Danish bank already announced in 2010 that it was boycotting two Israeli construction firms, Africa Israel and Denya Cebus, because of their involvement in construction of Jewish homes in Judea and Samaria, but Walla! noted that is the first time that the bank announces a boycott of an Israeli bank because it has invested heavily over the Green Line and has branches in the region.
At the same time, Nordea Bank has demanded that Israeli banks Leumi and Mizrahi-Tefahot immediately make public their operations in Judea and Samaria, the website reported.
An Israeli official told Walla! that “these instances highlight the danger and the problems of the European boycott. These are not decisions of the governments of Denmark and Sweden against Israel, but decisions of private, large influential companies. Even if we protest this decision to local governments, they have no ability to act against the these companies. We predict that the boycotts will only expand further.”
Europe has voiced continuous criticism over Israeli construction in Judea, Samaria and eastern Jerusalem, and several months ago published new guidelines which boycott Israeli entities operating beyond the 1949 Armistice Lines.
Several weeks ago, Haaretz reported that Germany is conditioning research support and cooperation with Israel on the exclusion of Jewish communities in Judea, Samaria and eastern Jerusalem.
The Walla! report comes on the same day that U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry threatened Israel that a failure in the peace talks would lead to global boycotts and delegitimization of the Jewish state.
Economy Minister Naftali Bennett responded to Kerry’s threats by saying that Israel will never submit to economic threats.
“I want to clarify to all those giving advice: the country has yet to be born that will give up its land because of economic threats, and we won’t either,” stated Bennett. “Only security will bring financial stability, not a terror state next to the Ben Gurion Airport.”
Similar posts
-
The Amazing Country of Israel
September 15, 2023Introduction Nestled in the heart of the Middle East, Israel is a nation with a remarkable histo...
-
Israel Safeguards The World From Terror Attacks
August 23, 2023Introduction In an era where terrorism poses a significant threat to global security, Israel sta...
-
Israel Helps The World With Water Recycling
August 10, 2023Introduction In a world grappling with the challenges of water scarcity and resource management,...
-
Israel's Remarkable Female Soldiers
July 26, 2023Introduction When we think of the Israeli military, we often conjure up images of well-trained s...
-
About Gal Gadot's Cleopatra Movie
July 18, 2023By Katy Rath Gal Gadot's new Cleopatra movie has been steeped in both anticipation and controver...
-
Israel Empowers The World Through Innovation
July 10, 2023BY: SOLVE ISRAEL'S PROBLEMS Introduction:In recent years, Israel has emerged as a global powerho...
-
The Jerusalem Embassy, 5 Years Later
May 22, 2023By Nikki Haley On May 14, 2018, something incredible happened. The United States...
-
Israel's Fauda Top TV Show in Arab Countries
February 1, 2023Even some Arab countries without diplomatic relations with Israel are hooked on the action-packed d...
Perhaps there are those whose pet projects were already in place within those companies and that is all . I would not venture to say that they are the voice of all the people there in those countries , and that before they would consider boycotts , they should check the historical preferences of their customers ! They may end up being “banks “in name only !